🔗 Share this article

"Half of my life is saved on this app, and now they want us to cover the cost for it."

Poor reviews and a perception of unfairness have dominated online discussion since Snapchat emerged as the most recent digital platform to put a price tag on a feature that people previously accessed for without payment.

Snap announced in September that it would require payment from people if they have exceeding five gigabytes of previously shared images and clips stored as Memories.

In the eyes of countless individuals, these retro posts serve as a window to the past – leading some to blast the company of "profit-driven motives" in messages on social media and poor reviews on Google and Apple's app stores.

Available Solutions

Snap has likened its subscription options to those made available by Apple and Google for handsets.

As another possibility for individuals avoiding fees, members have the ability to export their Memories – which for certain users span significant data – to their own hardware.

Snap mentioned that only a small number of members would be impacted by the new policy.

They recognized that it was "always challenging to shift from accessing content at no charge to paying for it" – but proposed it would be "justified by the benefits" for members.

Many opposing the change on the internet appear unconvinced.

Public Outcry

An online petition labeled the charge a "reminiscence fee", with users calling it "Orwellian" and "ridiculous" – while one person vowed to abandon the app from now on.

At the same time, in a one-star evaluation on the Google Play store, a person identifying as an online commenter said it felt "very unethical".

"As a member of that generation, the majority have years worth of personal moments on the platform," they said. "Numerous users only continued using Snapchat mostly for that feature. Such limited storage is inadequate when you have years worth of memories... Bye Snap."

Furthermore, a journalism student, a young adult aspiring reporter in a major city, shared on TikTok her decision to remove the application.

"I concluded that I had to save all my archived media as immediately," she stated. "The vast majority of my adolescence have been recorded through my Snapchat memories, all of the photos in there are deeply meaningful to me."

"This seems illogical to introduce fees users for a feature that has been free for so many years."

Unknown Fees

The platform has not yet said how much storage plans would be priced at in the UK – only that they are part of a "phased international launch".

But 23-year-old Amber Daley, who also lives in the capital, said in a video on the social platform that she would be "distraught" by these fees.

Amber noted that the app had become "a regular habit" since she began accessing it in 2014.

Despite admitting she accepted the platform needed to make money, Amber indicated that the saved content option holds greater significance than the company may have anticipated.

"Personally, I believe it's quite an unfair decision to demand payment from your subscribers who have been consistent and engaged," she said. "These aren't just called Memories, these are our real-life recollections."

Expert Analysis

Businesses deciding to charge from subscribers for a feature that was previously free is a common practice, and countless individuals cover the cost of services like cloud storage solutions to save their media content from their smartphone.

The truth of archiving content in the cloud – which some in the tech industry often describe as simply "an external server" – is that it requires funding.

"Hosting vast amounts of saved content on the service requires significant resources," online expert Matt Navarra explained. "Snapchat has to seek out a way to offset the expenses of storage, network usage, back-ups, file sharing, security measures – everything involved."

But the consultant indicated that imposing charges for a service that had earlier required no payment, and users had been invited to access as such, may feel like a "deceptive practice" for certain individuals.

"Moving the goalposts after individuals have built this extensive stored content seems unfair," he noted. In the view of countless individuals, he stated, "Archived media exceeds mere information, they're sentimental records."

The feeling was shared by those posting unfavorable comments, with an individual calling their saved images and clips "the most precious thing to me".

"The stored media includes each part of my personal journey within them from joyful events like births, sad moments of loss, experiences shared with close ones, [and] my entire youth," they expressed.

Research Perspective

A postdoctoral researcher, a university scholar at Utrecht University in the the Low Countries, stated that Snapchat's move highlights the ramifications of for-profit services being used to archive meaningful individual recordings.

"The companies profit from this reliance, mutual reliance, and expectation of continuous entry, which even encourages some users to stay on the service or continue to use it in order to revisit their saved content," she explained to journalists. "Yet these are not charitable custodians of individual recollection."