🔗 Share this article

Legal representatives informed the tribunal that law enforcement maintained reasonable suspicions indicating Tommy Robinson's phone contained information relevant to terrorist activities when they stopped him last year as he attempted to depart from the UK.

Refusal to Provide Phone Password

The right-wing campaigner, using his real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, reportedly refused to hand over his password to officers, stating it contained journalist content.” This occurred after he was intercepted at the Channel tunnel on July 28, 2024.

Trial Claims on Counter-Terrorism Authority

On the final day of the trial, prosecutor the prosecution stated that the counter-terrorism powers used by police are intended to permit information collection. She asserted that officers had reasonable suspicion to believe the defendant still have links to far-right activists, even after the dissolution of the English Defence League (EDL).

While his affiliation of the EDL has come to an end, his beliefs have not gone away. He is known for having those opinions and therefore it is a valid concern to believe that on his phone there could be information pertaining to acts of terrorism,” she informed Westminster magistrates court.

Morris continued, “His beliefs – to which he is entitled – were not the subject for their attention on 28 July. It was his connection to others who are possibly involved in illegal actions.”

Circumstances of the Detention

The activist had turned up by himself at the Eurotunnel in a silver Bentley owned by a acquaintance and was on his way to the Spanish resort of the Spanish coast with over £13,000 in a small bag, the court was told.

The funds was reportedly from a collection to cover expenses from organizing a large demonstration that took place the previous day in Trafalgar Square.

Defense Submissions

Robinson, who disputes non-compliance with counter-terrorism powers during the encounter on 28 July last year, faces up to 90 days in prison or a potential £2,500 penalty if convicted.

His lawyer, Alisdair Williamson KC, argued in final arguments that anti-terror officers who detained Robinson had conducted a speculative search” and that he had been unlawfully detained.

Citing testimony from officers who said they called other organizations” after arresting him, Williamson said this was a reference to the security services and that no evidence had been offered from the security service to suggest his client was a security threat.

He said the police intervention was biased” because it was based to a large extent on a personal attribute.” He said that the “predominant influence” on the decision to stop him was “‘oh look, it’s Tommy Robinson”.

He noted that officers had used an special authority that needs to be properly policed” to try to discover details that was already known. The barrister proposed that his client traveled to Benidorm frequently, which should have lessened the officers’ concerns about him.

Expenses and Judgment Timing

Robinson claimed that his legal costs in the case were being covered by the tech billionaire, the owner of X and Tesla, who has emerged as an ally of the far-right activist and recently addressed a rally arranged by him in the capital via a online broadcast.

A suggested day of next Tuesday for the verdict was changed by the magistrate, the judge, after the defense explained Robinson was due to be a guest of the Israel's administration from Wednesday and would not return until October 25.

{“I wouldn’t trouble you if this was a trip to Benidorm. I would ask him to rearrange it but he is a guest of a foreign government,” stated the barrister.

Goozee announced he would deliver his ruling on the morning of 4 November.