🔗 Share this article

For months, coercive messages continued. At first, allegedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a retired army general, later from the police themselves. In the end, one resident asserts he was ordered to law enforcement headquarters and told clearly: stop speaking out or encounter real trouble.

Shaikh is among those resisting a high-value project where Dharavi – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – is scheduled to be demolished and transformed by a corporate giant.

"The unique ecosystem of Dharavi is exceptional in the world," states the resident. "But they want to destroy our community and silence our voices."

Opposing Environments

The cramped lanes of Dharavi sit in stark contrast to the towering buildings and luxury apartments that dominate the settlement. Dwellings are built haphazardly and frequently without proper sanitation, informal businesses emit toxic smoke and the air is saturated with the overpowering odor of open sewers.

To some, the prospect of Dharavi transformed into a modern district of premium apartments, organized recreational areas, modern retail complexes and homes with multiple bathrooms is an optimistic future realized.

"There's no sufficient health services, roads or drainage and there's nowhere for youth to recreate," states a tea vendor, fifty-six, who relocated from his home state in that period. "The only way is to demolish everything and build us new homes."

Community Resistance

However, some, such as the leather artisan, are resisting the plan.

None deny that Dharavi, consistently overlooked as unauthorized settlement, is desperately requiring economic input and modernization. Yet they are concerned that this initiative – absent of public consultation – is one that will transform a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into a luxury development, evicting the marginalized, migrant communities who have lived there since the late 1800s.

This involved these excluded, migrant workers who built up the uninhabited area into a frequently examined example of community resilience and business activity, whose output is estimated at between one million dollars and a substantial sum per year, making it one of the world's largest informal economies.

Relocation Worries

Out of about 1 million inhabitants living in the crowded 2.2 square kilometer neighborhood, a minority will be able for replacement housing in the development, which is projected to take seven years to accomplish. Others will be transferred to undeveloped zones and saline fields on the far outskirts of the metropolis, potentially divide a generations-old community. Certain individuals will not get homes at all.

Those allowed to stay in the neighborhood will be allocated units in high-rise buildings, a substantial change from the evolved, shared lifestyle of living and working that has supported Dharavi for generations.

Industries from tailoring to ceramic crafts and recycling are expected to shrink in number and be relocated to an allocated "industrial sector" far from residential areas.

Survival Challenge

For residents like the leather artisan, a craftsman and third generation of his family to reside in this community, the plan presents a fundamental risk. His informal, three-floor operation makes apparel – sharp blazers, suede trenches, fashionable garments – marketed in high-end shops in the city's affluent areas and overseas.

Relatives lives in the rooms below and employees and tailors – laborers from north India – live on-site, allowing him to manage costs. Outside Dharavi's enclave, housing costs are frequently significantly more expensive for minimal space.

Threats and Warning

Within the administrative buildings nearby, a visual representation of the transformation initiative depicts an alternative perspective. Slickly dressed residents gather on cycles and eco-friendly transport, acquiring international bread and pastries and enlisting beverages on an outdoor area near a restaurant and treat station. It is a stark contrast from the affordable idli sambar morning meal and 5-rupee chai that maintains local residents.

"This isn't progress for us," says Shaikh. "This constitutes an enormous property transaction that will render it impossible for residents to remain."

There is also skepticism of the corporate group. Headed by a powerful tycoon – a leading figure and an associate of the Indian prime minister – the conglomerate has faced accusations of favoritism and financial impropriety, which it disputes.

Although administrative bodies labels it a joint project, the business group contributed $950m for its majority share. A lawsuit claiming that the initiative was improperly granted to the business group is pending in India's supreme court.

Continued Intimidation

Since they began to actively protest the project, protesters and community members assert they have been subjected to a long-running campaign of harassment and intimidation – involving messages, direct threats and suggestions that speaking against the development was tantamount to opposing national interests – by figures they claim are associated with the corporate group.

Included in these accused of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c